[PD] [pix_mix]

[Alexandros Drymonitis]

Anyway, I replaced [pix_mix] with a couple of [spigot]s inside a subpatch
and it works fine. Still, I think [pix_mix] would be more correct, so to
say, since I'm using Gem..


On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis <adrcki at gmail.com>wrote:

> I know that, I make sure that the pixes do have the same dimentions.
> Otherwise I would get an error, right? Also, the left inlet receives signal
> (if it doesn't it [pix_mix] won't output anything, I'm aware of that too).
> Could anything else be the problem?
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>wrote:
>
>> On 12/30/2012 11:26, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible if you have a few [pix_mix] objects that one or two of
>>> them are not working? I have a patch with four instances of the object
>>> and one of them is not working at all. It just lets the left inlet pass
>>> through. I tried them with and without arguments and it's all the same.
>>> Is there some problem with having a few instances or am I doing
>>> something wrong?
>>>
>>>
>> all pix-objects that take 2 pixes (including [pix_mix]), require that the
>> two pixes are of the same dimension and colorspace.
>> maybe that's the problem.
>>
>> fgmadsr
>> IOhannes
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
>> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121230/fa9b40d4/attachment-0001.htm>