[PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

[katja]

Yeah, sending FUDI would be good. Or OSC. In case of synthesis, better send
controller data instead of audio.

In my case (sending processed acoustic audio input) that wouldn't work, but
never mind.

Katja


On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Phil Stone <pkstone at ucdavis.edu> wrote:

> That's a fairly brilliant idea. No need for fancy audio-quality wireless
> units, either.
>
>
> Phil
>
>
> On 4/26/13 1:19 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
>> ______________________________**__
>>> From: katja <katjavetter at gmail.com>
>>> To: "onyx at onyx-ashanti.com" <onyxashanti at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: pd-list <Pd-list at iem.at>; Martin Peach <martin.peach at sympatico.ca>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:08 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Onyx,
>>>
>>> What is your aim, do you want to entertain your (physically present)
>>> audience via smart phones instead of PA system?
>>>
>>> I have a similar quest pending: to send Pd audio from a wearable
>>> computer over wireless to PA system.
>>>
>> Why not send FUDI to a box connected directly to the PA system?
>>
>> -Jonathan
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
>> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**
> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20130426/952a29f4/attachment.htm>