[PD] Android latency status?

[Rich E]

I'm not sure that I am the best person to chime in here, so I'm CC'ing
Peter Brinkmann, the main dude behind libpd and the android wrappers.


On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Scott R. Looney <scottrlooney at gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is extremely informative, Simon, and confirms much of the two sided
> situation i've seen in Android as far as latency is concerned.
>
> So, as far as we all know, libpd goes through the Java-based front door as
> it were. i wonder what it would take to go through the back door? is there
> anyone in the academic world working on low-level audio performance in
> Android?
>
>
libpd provides both routes - it will use OpenSL ES if available on the
device, or java + jni if you are on some old piece of junk. It will also
use the low latency settings if you are one of the select few devices that
have been blessed with this option. Still, none of the routes provide
latency that is ideal for real time audio applications.

AFAIK, the root of the latency comes from within the kernel's audio
drivers, so you don't gain a huge amount with OpenSL alone.  I'm not sure
if things have changed with the introduction of ART (dalvik replacement),
or if it matters...

cheers,
Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140808/ee837991/attachment.html>