[PD] Cyclone help patches & issue list

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

> I could put the compiled libraries somewhere online,
> but do not expect a neat installer.

No need for installers. If it's somewhere just compiled for the major
systems and with the source code for nerds everywhere is cool ;)

> There is no indication a new Extended release
> will happen any time soon.

I know, that's a bummer :( and that's why putting the library for download
seems important.

> the formula in the code is the same as found
> in the Max5 documentation

yeah, but does it show you how to calculate the coefficients besides the
formula?

cheers

2014-12-15 16:08 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl>:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
> >> Sorry, yes pd-extended 0.44.
> >
> > sure, but when I first mentioned about versions, I was thinking about
> > cyclone's own version number.
> >
> > I assume there's one, right? And I also assume you have it for download
> > somewhere for people to include it in Pd Vanilla. Where can we get it?
> >
> Currently it appears only in the pd META sub-patch of the help-patches. It
> is currently 0.1-alpha56. Adding it to each object would be a good thing
> and report it at load time (Debug-level). But this would mean changing all
> objects. Something for the todo list.
>
> Currently there are only some patches in the patch tracker, and linux 32
> bit executables on my harddisk. The idea is to test them on several
> platforms, including linux 64 bit, Windows 32 bit and Macos X 10.7 (64
> bit). I could put the compiled libraries somewhere online, but do not
> expect a neat installer. I would consider it a temporary stop-gap for
> the time there is no proper distribution.
>
> > If Extended keeps on delaying too much for an update, I'm gonna start
> > just getting all the libraries I use into vanilla :(
>
> There is no indication a new Extended release will happen any time soon.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > ps. while we're at it, I have a question, are [lores~] and [reson~]
> > perfect copies of the Max's objects, same formula and everything, or
> > just something similar?
>
> The objects should be proper clones, but I haven't checked them in that
> much detail. At first glance I would say, the formula in the code is the
> same as found in the Max5 documentation.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Fred Jan
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20141215/42b12e38/attachment.html>