[PD] More teeth. Was: cyclone abstractions was: Nettles.

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

hello, I had plans to try working on a .c code for it, and my idea was to
just adapt from [comb~].

Yeah... Teeth is almost identical to [comb~]!

In [comb~] you have the same delay time for the feedforward and the
feedback. In [teeth~] you can specify different time delays for feedforward
and feedback. So you basically have only one extra time delay parameter to
include in [comb~] and... voilà, you've got [teeth~]!

Hope this makes it clear for you.

Cheers

2015-06-23 4:56 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl>:

> Hi Alexandre,
>
> Just now I completed the c code for a teeth~ object, which doesn't seem
> to crash instantly and sounds* the same as your abstraction which is now
> in cyclone.
>
> The block diagram in your help patch made it very clear what should  be
> coded. The only thing (what an expert told me), was that 'z' applies to
> samples, and teeth~ is controlled in milli-seconds.
>
> While coding, I found the delay time has to be zero or positive, but the
> gain coefficients can be negative too, adding the delayed signal out of
> phase.
>
> I have no plans to add the object to cyclone anytime soon. First spend
> some time figuring out that i really does what I think it does. It
> doesn't crash instantly, and output looks sinusoid with a sinus input,
> but that doesn't prove much. And at least some form of interpolation
> should be added before it is ready for prime time.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Fred Jan
>
> *) the help patch sounds equally weird with both, using only the
> positive gains
>
> On 2015-06-15 04:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > it's just a preview, I'm gonna still work on them and help files :)
> >
> > 2015-06-15 10:38 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl
> > <mailto:fjkraan at xs4all.nl>>:
> >
> >     Hi Alexandre,
> >
> >     Thanks for the abstractions. I will include them in the svn
> repository
> >     and the next binary deken compatible builds. Only rect~ didn't work.
> >
> >     I applied some minor modification by replacing [pi], which doesn't
> >     appear to be vanilla by [3.141593(.
> >
> >     Greetings,
> >
> >     Fred Jan
> >
> >     P.S. Wouldn't mind if the future supplied help-patches were already
> >     cyclone-standard formatting ;-).
> >
> >     On 2015-06-14 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> >     >> Any object or abstraction that implements something
> >     >> present in Max(5) could be part of cyclone.
> >     >
> >     > i've made 13 abstractions so far
> >     >
> >     > - atodb
> >     > - atodb~
> >     > - dbtoa
> >     > - dbtoa~
> >     > - freqshift~
> >     > - rect~
> >     > - saw~
> >     > - scale
> >     > - scale~
> >     > - teeth~
> >     > - thresh~
> >     > - tri~
> >     > - trunc~
> >     >
> >     > Gonna try and do a few of these more, I have more 5 in mind so
> far. I
> >     > guess some make much more sense as objects, like
> >     [rect~]/[tri~]/[saw~].
> >     > Here's a preview attached.
> >     >
> >     > cheers
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150623/49b87b55/attachment.html>