[PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 09/05/2015 11:58 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Unfortunately, Max does not have a partitioned convolution object, I think
> that there had to be one... but whatever...

probably. but not our problem :-)

> 
> Anyway, I don't believe 4096 is such a costy even if doing this increases
> cmputation time. And we still have other options like [partconv~] and
> [FIR~] in Pd. But in practice I think we'll have [buffir~] as a better/more
> versatile object/option than [FIR~] in the end. 

what makes it better/more versatile than [FIR~]?



fdmsr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150906/7d0295ac/attachment-0001.sig>