[PD] "G05.execution.order" issue (bug? just wrong?)

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

> it's undefined.

But how is it "undefined behaviour"? For trigger, for example, I understand
the order of connections will define the order of messages being sent,
right? I mean, every time I've tested it, it worked. But is it at some
level really "undefined" and might not work?

and what would the internal workings be for this audio connections? It's
still unclear to me

thanks


2015-08-26 4:49 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:

> On 2015-08-26 06:25, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> >> Yes, you can get 'correct' execution order by just
> >> adding your objects in the right order.
> >
> > what is the "right order" then?
>
> it's undefined.
>
> (conceptually) it's the very same as using a fan-out without [trigger]:
> if you are lucky (or know the interna) you can get your patch working
> fine without ever needing [t].
> but you still rely on undefined behaviour; and relying on undefined
> behaviour is imho a bug.
>
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150907/dc863d5d/attachment.html>