[PD] [vd~] VS [delread~] - different delay limit!

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

funny, I found out about the same thing and just posted on the thread that
I'm reporting it as a bug

Well, my oppinion is that there might be some explanation why it happens,
but also that both objects have bugs regarding the way they operate as they
can't reach the delay limit when it comes to changing the block size, and
they also have different limits... so both should be fixed to just be able
to reach the specified maximum limit.

cheers

2015-09-22 15:17 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>:

> In the course of a discussion with Alexandre I ran into something really
> interesting: [delread~] and [vd~] have different delay limits! While
> [delread~] has always the buffersize minus the blocksize of the subpatch
> where it is located, the limit of [vd~] is 64 samples greater. Any
> explanations?
>
> In my example patch, simply choose any blocksize, then set the delay time
> to maximum 100 (which is actually beyond the maximum), and then toggle
> between [vd~] and [delread~] to see the 64 samples difference...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150922/9d24579f/attachment.html>