[PD] Send/Receive topology design

cyrille henry ch at chnry.net
Thu Jan 5 12:57:37 CET 2017



Le 05/01/2017 à 12:48, Liam Goodacre a écrit :
>
>
>
>>> Do you know if it is better to have :
>>> - [r NOTE]-->[route $1] objects inside 50 abstractions
>>> - or only one [r NOTE] --> [route 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .... ] and
>>> cords to these 50 abstractions
>
>
>> the former is easier to patch. the latter will perform slightly better.
>
>
> Another solution here would be to put the ID numbers inside the send and receive objects. Ie this in the parent:
>
> |
> [t b f]
> |     |
> |    [makefilename %d-channel]
> |     \
> [send]
>
>

an other solution is to use the new [clone] object.
You can do things like this very easily, and i think in an optimized way.

cheers
c

>
> and this in the abstraction:
>
> [receive $1-channel]
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>



More information about the Pd-list mailing list