[PD] [line] discontinuity

[Roman Haefeli]

On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 09:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2017-01-15 22:58, Miller Puckette wrote:
> > 
> > I can't understand what is wrong... if you 'stop' a line~ and then
> > later
> > give it a new target, it ramps form the position it had stoped
> > at.  I think
> > this is the most reasonable behavior.  Or is it doing something
> > different
> > somehow?

Before I create more confusion, let's focus on the ~ . I suspect [line]
to be buggy, not [line~]. I only mentioned [line~] as a reference and
since [line~] is doing what we agree it should do, I believe the
behavior of [line] is buggy.

> it starts from the original position, rather than the current one.
> 
> that is:
> if i stop a [0, 1 1000( after 999ms, the current position is
> something
> like 0.999.
> however, if i then send it a [0 1000( i will start from 0 (does
> effectively not doing anything, as it ramps from 0 to 0)!
> 
> i would have expected it to start from 0.999 (or somewhere close to)
> and
> ramp down.

Yes, that is the current behavior with [line]. I guess Miller was
looking at [line~]. 

I'm sorry for not having been more clear in my second mail.

Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170116/3f9b9bbf/attachment.sig>