[PD] [feature request] cloning array define?

[Henri Augusto Bisognini]

That would be great indeed.


Maybe use [namecanvas] to avoid naming conflicts.


________________________________
De: Pd-list <pd-list-bounces at lists.iem.at> em nome de Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>
Enviado: sábado, 16 de junho de 2018 19:01
Para: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Assunto: Re: [PD] [feature request] cloning array define?

Doh, "subpath" = subpatCh ... as in [pd foo] -> [clone 16 pd-foo] some how...

On Jun 16, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com<mailto:danomatika at gmail.com>> wrote:

What would be *more useful* would being able to clone a subpath, then I wouldn't need to have a bunch of single-object instantion wrappers around...

On 06/15/2018 11:07 AM, Jaime Oliver La Rosa wrote:
Hello all,

Here is a somewhat half-baked feature request.

It would be great to be able to clone objects such as array.

like the attached abstraction?

use as:
[clone arraydefine 16 foo-]


Would this be possible?


i don't really see the point of adding syntactic sugar that can be
trivially implemented with a single-object abstraction wrapper.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika<http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com<http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com<http://robotcowboy.com/>




--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika<http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com<http://danomatika.com>
robotcowboy.com<http://robotcowboy.com>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180616/6b986dd2/attachment.html>