[PD] Changing Send/Receive Names After Instantiation

[oliver]

IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:

> 
> changing the receiver is dangerous (as in: could crash your system).

really ? that's (bad) news to me.
how so ? why could that crash a system ?
and why is it not dangerous to change the receiver in the signal domain ?

would you say, it's "saver" to do dynamic patching if a [receive] has to 
be flexible ? (i.e. create and destroy vanilla [recieve] objects in a 
subpatch when they need to have another address)

(atm i use [iem_receive] quite a lot in my patches ...)

thanks for any insight

oliver