<p><br />hi guys</p><p>if it was up to me i'd vote:</p><p>[float 1( -> 1 </p><p>[1 2 3( -> 3</p><p>[list a b c( -> 3</p><p>[set a b c( -> 4</p><p>[set( -> 1</p><p> [symbol a( -> 1</p><p>[a( -> 1</p><p>...that's just my personal view...</p><p>eni </p><p> </p><p><br /><br /><strong>On Ven Oct 27 10:59 , Roman Haefeli sent:<br /><br /></strong><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(245, 245, 245); margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 0px;">On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 07:46 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:<br />
> Hallo,<br />
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:<br />
> <br />
> > I think this logic makes sense, but I haven't played with it yet.<br />
> <br />
> You don't need to play with it much, it's a decision to make: Do you<br />
> want to have [list length] give the same length for "1 2 3" and "a b<br />
> c" and "list a b c" or should "a b c" be one less?<br />
<br />
i think it is at least consistent in the sense, how list-objects work<br />
generally. would you want [list length] to count the selector in a list<br />
starting with a number as well? [1 2 3( -> 4, like [list a b c( -> would<br />
give 4 then? <br />
<br />
roman<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
___________________________________________________________ <br />
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: <a target="_blank" href="../parse.pl?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fmessenger.yahoo.de">http://messenger.yahoo.de</a><br />
<br />
<br />
_______________________________________________<br />
<a href="javascript:top.opencompose('PD-list@iem.at','','','')">PD-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br />
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a target="_blank" href="../parse.pl?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Flists.puredata.info%2Flistinfo%2Fpd-list">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br />
</blockquote>
</p><BR>