<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/4/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Hans-Christoph Steiner</b> <<a href="mailto:hans@eds.org">hans@eds.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style=""><div><span class="q" id="q_10f4f183baa0bef5_1"><br></span></div><div>I think that all the optimization that you guys have done is great. But it would be very helpful to a lot of people if the optimization did not prevent those of us with older hardware from even starting Gem.
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>I don't think it does. The configure detects hardware and libraries reasonably well and the provided binaries either have runtime checks or different versions for the respective hardware and OS versions.
<br><br>If you ran the configure on an ATI machine and ended up with the NV extensions then that is a bug, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.<br></div><br></div><br>