That is the best way? Hm, I'm surprised! Ok, I'll get to work then- It means the layer with the system topology needs to have its sampling block forced to 1. Mightn't this affect performance? especially for a large program?
<br>Anyway thanks for the advice<br>Kim<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/30/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Derek Holzer</b> <<a href="mailto:derek@umatic.nl">derek@umatic.nl</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Kim,<br><br>Kim Taylor wrote:<br><br> > The only way I can think of overcoming the DSP loop problem is to use<br>a delread~ and delwrite~ to complete the loop, setting the delay time to<br>0 and setting the level sampling block size to 1.
<br><br>Because of PD's structure, it is exactly that delay which is necessary.<br>Computers are dumb animals, and need to be told to do things in certain<br>orders of operation, and not everything at once ;-) Frustrating, but
<br>necessary. Implementing the shortest block size possible and sending<br>your feedback through that is just about the only workaround, so you're<br>on the right track already.<br><br>d.<br><br>--<br>derek holzer :::
<a href="http://www.umatic.nl">http://www.umatic.nl</a><br>---Oblique Strategy # 202:<br>"Back up a few steps.<br>What else could you have done?"<br></blockquote></div><br>