yes, the question was why want it as smooth in pd as in other softwares...<br><br>but hey, you say it was as bas in all you had... hmm, that sounds weird to me, cause thats not what i got.<br><br>well, the matter is also not the sample anyway... being dodgy or not, and it is actually a looping matter in pd.<br><br>i aint got that many loops here actually, so I couldnt try them to see if another .wav file would do better... i will look for it though... and test it.<br><br>Do you guys have any patch at all that loops .wav files rather nicely the way I want, which is continuosly loud without envelopes and all?<br><br>cheers<br>alex<br><br><b><i>hard off <hard.off@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> well, i just checked the sample, and it didn't loop smoothly in any<br>software i have.<br><br>then i opened it in a sound editor, and the start point is zero, but<br>the end
point is not zero, which would be why pd makes a "drastic"<br>click.<br><br><br>i will now bow out of this discussion, because i can't see why anyone<br>would want to loop such a dodgy sample in the first place.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>PD-list@iem.at mailing list<br>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list<br></blockquote><br><p> 
<hr size=1>TV dinner still cooling?<br><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49979/*http://tv.yahoo.com/">Check out "Tonight's Picks"</a> on Yahoo! TV.