hi there, has anyone downloaded the patch from <b><i>padawan12</i></b>?<br><br>it is called called scanner.pd and should work as a nice looper...<br><br>the author couldnt find it...<br><br>Cheers<br><br><b><i>padawan12 <padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <br>Damn! :) I can't find it on the archive and I lost my local copy.<br>Maybe ask if anyone else downloaded it. That's all I can think of right now.<br><br>On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 05:59:00 -0800 (PST)<br>PORRES <mentalosmosis@yahoo.com> wrote:<br><br>> great, Im new on the list though, how can i get the posted patch?<br>> <br>> cheers<br>> <br>> padawan12 <padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote: <br>> I don't know if you remember a patch I posted a few months ago called scanner.pd<br>> That was a kind of granular, overlap and add, two tables with very big<br>> windows of about one
second. Each table is enveloped with a half cosine<br>> and so by swapping alternately between two tables out of phase<br>> you have a smooth sound. It was actually quite simple, just a few multiplies<br>> and a cos. Afaics this would be fine for getting steady<br>> sample based sounds like sustained bowed strings etc. Just load the same<br>> sample into both tables.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:46:12 -0800 (PST)<br>> PORRES wrote:<br>> <br>> > yes, the question was why want it as smooth in pd as in other softwares...<br>> > <br>> > but hey, you say it was as bas in all you had... hmm, that sounds weird to me, cause thats not what i got.<br>> > <br>> > well, the matter is also not the sample anyway... being dodgy or not, and it is actually a looping matter in pd.<br>> > <br>> > i aint got that many loops here actually, so I couldnt try them to see if another .wav file
would do better... i will look for it though... and test it.<br>> > <br>> > Do you guys have any patch at all that loops .wav files rather nicely the way I want, which is continuosly loud without envelopes and all?<br>> > <br>> > cheers<br>> > alex<br>> > <br>> > hard off wrote: well, i just checked the sample, and it didn't loop smoothly in any<br>> > software i have.<br>> > <br>> > then i opened it in a sound editor, and the start point is zero, but<br>> > the end point is not zero, which would be why pd makes a "drastic"<br>> > click.<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > i will now bow out of this discussion, because i can't see why anyone<br>> > would want to loop such a dodgy sample in the first place.<br>> > <br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > PD-list@iem.at mailing list<br>> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ---------------------------------<br>> > TV dinner still cooling?<br>> > Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ---------------------------------<br>> Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.<br></padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk></mentalosmosis@yahoo.com></blockquote><br><p> 
<hr size=1>Don't be flakey. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43909/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail">Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile</a> and <br><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43909/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail">always stay connected</a> to friends.