<br><div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Using a table normally is faster, especially if you want to access values by<br>
index (that is, not sequentially). You can do some optimizations, too:<br>For one, you can get rid of one counter, if you send the RGB-list to:<br><br> [list]<br> |<br> [list split 3]<br> |<br> [unpack 0 0 0]<br> | | |
<br> ... put to tables<br><br>Even faster probably is using just one table for all RGB values: Just<br>do a [list prepend 0] after [pix dump] and send the 0-prepended list<br>to a sender with your table-name as target.<br>
<br>You can still access the individual R, G, or B values by adjusting<br>your index into [tabread] accordingly (use: 3*index + X with X = 0, 1<br>or 2)<br><br>Ciao<br>--<br> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>Thank you very much!<br><br>Pretty useful!<br><br>Saludos!<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Raul Diaz Poblete<br>*************************<br><a href="mailto:raul.lete@gmail.com">raul.lete@gmail.com
</a><br>Ciudad Real [Spain]