<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 19, 2007 5:48 PM, Javier Garcia <<a href="mailto:tirengarfio@hotmail.com">tirengarfio@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div style="text-align: left;">My intention was to create an object for GEM that would insert a 3D animation. But i have seen this email:<br><br><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-12/057913.html" target="_blank">
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-12/057913.html</a></div></div></blockquote><div><br>There are certainly other ways to do animation without using OGRE. OGRE has too much overlap with GEM and would not be easy to integrate unless you really just want to replace all of GEM with OGRE.
<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-12/057913.html" target="_blank">
</a>I have to tell my knowledge about OpenGL is low-medium.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Concentrating on a cross-platform GL project would be my recommendation. There are a variety of 'unfinished' parts of GEM that could use some attention. The vertex_array branch, multiple windows/screens, render to texture, upgraded paticle system and so on.
<br><br>Also, you might not have to do much coding to come up with a library of patches that integrate already existing parts of GEM like shaders with physical modeling or advanced lighting for example. <br> </div></div>
<br>