You need x86 versions of your libraries. 0.38.4 probably ran entirely under Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native. Downloading full pd-extended for OSX Intel should get the right set.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <<a href="mailto:bfcarney@gmail.com">bfcarney@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello there all<div><br></div><div>Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?</div><div><br>
</div><div>All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version, I get this.</div><div><br></div><div><div>/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin, 10): no suitable image found. Did find:</div>
<div><span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: mach-o, but wrong architecture</div><div>fftease: can't load library</div>
<div>iemabs: can't load library</div><div>iemmatrix: can't load library</div><div>liblist: can't load library</div><div>PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs</div><div>PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 ( <a href="mailto:ydegoyon@free.fr" target="_blank">ydegoyon@free.fr</a> )</div>
<div><br></div> I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no avail.</div><div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div><br>
</div><div><br>-- <br><br>Ben C.
</div>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:PD-list@iem.at">PD-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>