<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
</div>it does and it has been discussed multiple times on this list:<br>
sending a command to the [shell] will start a new process (shell), run<br>
the command and quit. like it should be, child processes do not modify<br>
parent processes and siblings.<br></blockquote><div><br>Ah. This makes sense.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
i am not sure what you would like to achieve with [pwd] or [cd]<br>
that is: if you could manage with [pwd] and [cd], why can't you do so<br>
with the current absolute/relative path in [openpanel]?<br>
</blockquote><div><br>I was just looking for a quick hack to get my patches working that try to open up a specific directory using [openpanel]. But I guess the real solution is making [openpanel]/[savepanel] relative to the patch it they live in. I don't really know how this would work for an [openpanel]/[savepanel] within an abstraction.<br>
<br>-rich<br><br></div></div>