Am I missing something or wouldn't it be simplest to add a quick and dirty 5 ms or so fade in/out envelope that follows the timing of the array triggers?<br><br>~Kyle<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Andy Farnell <<a href="mailto:padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk">padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
Hi Lau,<br>
<br>
I guess you're building a beat concatenator so you have no<br>
room for introducing timing offsets.<br>
<br>
First, termminology - let's not call these "clips", I think<br>
discontinuities is a better word.<br>
<br>
Your first solution is similar to what is being discussed in another<br>
thread on dynamic delays - Millers "rendezvous" algorithm where<br>
the two segments are spliced via a DC offset introduced by a ramp.<br>
<br>
The second one really amounts to crossfading or short window<br>
average filter. Further, how can you<br>
be sure your detector won't have a false positive from a fast<br>
signal slew rate?<br>
<br>
If my assumption is right then for simplicity I suggest<br>
revising your constraints. A 64 sample crossfade will introduce<br>
negligable timing problems.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Use the source<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>-----<br>------------<br> ---- -----<br>---- -------- - ------<br><a href="http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com">http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com</a><br><a href="http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz">http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz</a>