<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt">Hi,<br> I did,<br>in fact I'm using sigmund~ cause somewhere in this list, someone (Miller?) said it was better to use it instead of fiddle~. Can anybody confirm that sigmund~ is better? I have a patch that relies on realtime pitch and partials extraction, and I'd like to compare different objects but I have only found sigmund~. Sigmund~ reports peaks by analyzing the FFT of a window, I'd like to compare other methods (stft?, wavelets?, ...?) <br><div> <br>Any other ideas?<br><br>Thanks!<br><br></div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.julovi.net">Julian Villegas</a><br><br>Me pregunto de un modo pensativo<br>Que significa ser Colombiano?<br>No se le respondi. Es un acto de fe<br> JLB.<div><br></div><div style="font-family: times
new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: hard off <hard.off@gmail.com><br>To: Julian Villegas <julovi@yahoo.com><br>Cc: Isidro Gonzalez <isidro_gonsoy@yahoo.com>; pd-list@iem.at<br>Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 8:17:10 PM<br>Subject: Re: [PD] frequency components analysis<br><br>
you looked at [fiddle~] right?<br><br><br></div></div></div><br>
</body></html>