Thanks. Tried that (48K sampling) but no dice. However, I did finally get it to work:<br><br><ul><li>Installed ASIO4ALL</li><li>Uninstalled the Samson Softpre audio driver (which I wasn't using). I discovered that this driver was causing Pd to crash when I was choosing ASIO from Pd.<br>
</li><li>From the ASIO dialog box in Pd, chose ASIO4ALL and made the number of channels equal to the number of sound cards * 2.</li></ul>-John<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:37 AM, nick burge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tectp@telefonica.net">tectp@telefonica.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
I had exactly the same messages when installing my firewire interface<br>
(fireface400)and attempting to get the 8 ins and outs that should have been<br>
available.<br>
By changing the samplerate from 44.1 to 48khz in audio settings I was able<br>
to get the thing working....the system clock of the interface has to be in<br>
agreement with pd I suppose.<br>
Good luck, Nick<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at">pd-list-bounces@iem.at</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at">pd-list-bounces@iem.at</a>] On Behalf Of<br>
<a href="mailto:pd-list-request@iem.at">pd-list-request@iem.at</a><br>
Sent: 22 March 2009 12:00<br>
To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
Subject: Pd-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 110<br>
<br>
Send Pd-list mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:pd-list-request@iem.at">pd-list-request@iem.at</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:pd-list-owner@iem.at">pd-list-owner@iem.at</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Pd-list digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. multiple sound cards on XP? (John Harrison)<br>
2. Re: ADSR variations [was: Re: Patch-off] (Jonathan Wilkes)<br>
3. Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea: [send<br>
(Matt Barber)<br>
4. Re: does anyone know of a good Eq I can use? (hard off)<br>
5. Re: Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea: [send<br>
(Jonathan Wilkes)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:03:45 -0500<br>
From: John Harrison <<a href="mailto:johnharrisonwsu@gmail.com">johnharrisonwsu@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [PD] multiple sound cards on XP?<br>
To: PD List <<a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:7aa995dd0903211903k12b5b0cfia00e52da4e5f0e30@mail.gmail.com">7aa995dd0903211903k12b5b0cfia00e52da4e5f0e30@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Is there a way to get Pd to use multiple sound cards on XP? I've had no<br>
problem doing this in Linux, but in XP on both Pd vanilla 0.42-4and<br>
Pd-extended 0.40.3-extended-20080721, trying to configure MMIO with multiple<br>
cards is giving me:<br>
<br>
Terminal Window:<br>
<br>
waveInOpen: The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.<br>
Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.<br>
<br>
Pd console:<br>
<br>
separate audio device choice not supported\; using sequential devices.<br>
<br>
and no input/output on both cards with one configuration.<br>
<br>
If I choose ASIO, Pd crashes instantly with this message in the terminal<br>
window:<br>
Failed to open () = 0DEV not openDEV not openDeviceIoControl STOP_ISO_STREAM<br>
com<br>
plete, success = 0<br>
DEV not openDEV not open<br>
<br>
I have ASIO4ALL installed and did seem to have good luck with that in the<br>
past on another machine...<br>
<br>
I'd like to have multiple Griffin iMics plugged into an XP machine and all<br>
accessible with one instance of Pd.<br>
<br>
-John<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL:<br>
<<a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090321/3ded9801/%0Aattachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090321/3ded9801/<br>
attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:05:15 -0700 (PDT)<br>
From: Jonathan Wilkes <<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [PD] ADSR variations [was: Re: Patch-off]<br>
To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a>, Frank Barknecht <<a href="mailto:fbar@footils.org">fbar@footils.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:109351.44216.qm@web65601.mail.ac4.yahoo.com">109351.44216.qm@web65601.mail.ac4.yahoo.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Frank Barknecht <<a href="mailto:fbar@footils.org">fbar@footils.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> From: Frank Barknecht <<a href="mailto:fbar@footils.org">fbar@footils.org</a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [PD] ADSR variations [was: Re: Patch-off]<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 2:37 AM<br>
> Hallo,<br>
> Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:<br>
><br>
> > I agree. I also like the use of list in that patch to<br>
> store parameters.<br>
> ><br>
> > So if you wanted to set parameters with creation<br>
> arguments, would it just be a matter of using $1...$5 in the<br>
> [list]s and (un)[pack]?<br>
><br>
> Yes, almost. [list] is a shortcut for [list append] so you<br>
> need to use:<br>
> [list append $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] or so.<br>
<br>
Actually [list $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] seems to work in this context, but I guess<br>
that's because the first arg isn't a symbol. Is that why you're saying<br>
[list append] is needed?<br>
<br>
-Jonathan<br>
<br>
><br>
> Ciao<br>
> --<br>
> Frank<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -><br>
> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:52:05 -0400<br>
From: Matt Barber <<a href="mailto:brbrofsvl@gmail.com">brbrofsvl@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [PD] Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea:<br>
[send<br>
To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:c71d8c030903212152v2ce34cb6o41f3eef8205eeab0@mail.gmail.com">c71d8c030903212152v2ce34cb6o41f3eef8205eeab0@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
> Here's my proposal: horizontal connections should only be used when the<br>
upper object has only one outlet, and the lower object has only one inlet.<br>
?Otherwise there will be always be ambiguity.<br>
><br>
> With your example of all outlets pointing to the same inlet, there is<br>
still ambiguity as to whether or not all the outlets are actually connected.<br>
?That's fine if your patching style is to connect them first, and only line<br>
them up after. ?But if someone is debugs a patch they made that includes<br>
your abstraction, they would have to click and move objects to be certain<br>
all the objects are actually connected.<br>
<br>
<br>
There is one way to be a little less conservative, but it requires a<br>
usage agreement: if a horizontal connection travels from left to<br>
right, it must come from the right-most outlet of the upper object and<br>
must connect to the left-most inlet of the lower object. Reverse if<br>
the connection travels from right to left. The problem is there's no<br>
good way to tell if a patch adheres to the agreement.<br>
<br>
Matt<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:15:24 +0900<br>
From: hard off <<a href="mailto:hard.off@gmail.com">hard.off@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [PD] does anyone know of a good Eq I can use?<br>
To: patrick <<a href="mailto:puredata@11h11.com">puredata@11h11.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:161320dd0903220015v55dfffbbm8e845c0b3d74bae4@mail.gmail.com">161320dd0903220015v55dfffbbm8e845c0b3d74bae4@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
there are a few EQ units in my DIY library:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-1982-diy2-effects-sample-players-synths-so%0Aund-synthesis" target="_blank">http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-1982-diy2-effects-sample-players-synths-so<br>
und-synthesis</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL:<br>
<<a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/bc542942/%0Aattachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/bc542942/<br>
attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:00:44 -0700 (PDT)<br>
From: Jonathan Wilkes <<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [PD] Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea:<br>
[send<br>
To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a>, Matt Barber <<a href="mailto:brbrofsvl@gmail.com">brbrofsvl@gmail.com</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:659635.57125.qm@web65603.mail.ac4.yahoo.com">659635.57125.qm@web65603.mail.ac4.yahoo.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Matt,<br>
I like the usage agreement idea, as long as there's visual feedback.<br>
For example, if the inlets and outlets in pd-ext protruded one or two<br>
pixels, you'd be able to see the connection crossing over to the "wrong"<br>
outlet.<br>
<br>
-Jonathan<br>
<br>
--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Matt Barber <<a href="mailto:brbrofsvl@gmail.com">brbrofsvl@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> From: Matt Barber <<a href="mailto:brbrofsvl@gmail.com">brbrofsvl@gmail.com</a>><br>
> Subject: [PD] Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea: [send<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 5:52 AM<br>
> > Here's my proposal: horizontal connections should<br>
> only be used when the upper object has only one outlet, and<br>
> the lower object has only one inlet. ?Otherwise there will<br>
> be always be ambiguity.<br>
> ><br>
> > With your example of all outlets pointing to the same<br>
> inlet, there is still ambiguity as to whether or not all the<br>
> outlets are actually connected. ?That's fine if your<br>
> patching style is to connect them first, and only line them<br>
> up after. ?But if someone is debugs a patch they made that<br>
> includes your abstraction, they would have to click and move<br>
> objects to be certain all the objects are actually<br>
> connected.<br>
><br>
><br>
> There is one way to be a little less conservative, but it<br>
> requires a<br>
> usage agreement: if a horizontal connection travels from<br>
> left to<br>
> right, it must come from the right-most outlet of the upper<br>
> object and<br>
> must connect to the left-most inlet of the lower object.<br>
> Reverse if<br>
> the connection travels from right to left. The problem is<br>
> there's no<br>
> good way to tell if a patch adheres to the agreement.<br>
><br>
> Matt<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -><br>
> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: twopix.png<br>
Type: image/png<br>
Size: 1298 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
URL:<br>
<<a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/%0Aattachment-0002.png" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/<br>
attachment-0002.png</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: fourpix.png<br>
Type: image/png<br>
Size: 1334 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
URL:<br>
<<a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/%0Aattachment-0003.png" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/<br>
attachment-0003.png</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pd-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a><br>
to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see<br>
<a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of Pd-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 110<br>
****************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>