> Do we want pdpedia to just be a reference manual of objects?<div><br></div><div>I think it is a good start. To have a list of Every Object out there, and make clear which are written, and the ones who are not. And discuss in a group of interested people a sort of division of works, strategies... etc.</div>
<div><br></div><div>A nice and simple model must be followed, we could think about expanding pdpedia for other info later, as I believe this is very urgent.</div><div><br></div><div>Now, I would really love to collaborate, who is there already for me to join? And whoelse wants to join too?</div>
<div><br></div><div>cheers</div><div><br></div><div><br>
<div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; ">
<br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:09:07 +0100<br>From: Philip Potter <<a href="mailto:philip.g.potter@gmail.com">philip.g.potter@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [PD] Pdpedia and random generation<br>
To: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:91dd35300903311409r7608a1cbw9a0d66e8b1075cb3@mail.gmail.com">91dd35300903311409r7608a1cbw9a0d66e8b1075cb3@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br>2009/3/31 Alexandre Porres <<a href="mailto:porres@gmail.com">porres@gmail.com</a>>:<br>> so we need :someone" to manage the system, ok, but then I see that this<br>
> problem is kinda well solved, right?<br>> But how do you all see the writting of articles? Is it growing out well? I<br>> believe "someone" could also direct how things are going, and that a main<br>> team could work on it by fomenting its development and all...<br>
> right?<br><br>Something like a WikiProject on wikipedia? It would be good to have<br>standards on how articles should be formatted and what kind of<br>information should be presented. I see there has been some effort to<br>
generate a standard layout for an article on an object, with inlets,<br>outlets, arguments and messages as separate sections; but I can't find<br>a good article to serve as an example for how all articles should<br>look. The best I can find is:<br>
<a href="http://wiki.puredata.info/en/dac~" target="_blank">http://wiki.puredata.info/en/dac~</a><br><a href="http://wiki.puredata.info/en/metro" target="_blank">http://wiki.puredata.info/en/metro</a><br>If more articles looked like this, I think pdpedia would be much more useful.<br>
<br>Do we want pdpedia to just be a reference manual of objects, or do we<br>also want to include design patterns such as the [pack 0 0 0 0<br>0]/[unpack 0 0 0 0 0] idiom mentioned elsethread, tutorials, good<br>practices and suchlike?<br>
<br>Philip</blockquote></div></div></div>