<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:32 AM, cyrille henry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cyrille.henry@la-kitchen.fr">cyrille.henry@la-kitchen.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
source code for both object look really diferent, so i don't know if it is possible.<br>
but seriously : why do you need to replace vcf~ with bp~???<br>
<br>
Cyrille</blockquote></div><br>I wouldn't say I *need* to, I'd just like to... Here's an example: I was making a composition that used a choral pad with vcf~ objects acting as movable formants. I decided I only really need the voices to sing "aaaaah," so I realized I don't need the movable formants after all, so I can economize on CPU by using static bandpass filters rather than moving ones. I've never seen anything about differences between the filters' internal math, so I was surprised to find that they sound different.<br>
<br>So basically what I want to know is: if I have a vcf~ with a given q and constant center frequency, is there a way to replace it more cheaply?<br><br>--Stefán<br>