<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I only have little experience, but from what I've seen so far is that pitch detection with sigmund~ is faster than fiddle~.<div><br></div><div>On the other hand I found the level setting 'minpower' not working or at least nor responsive to changes that I tried out. I do not have experimented with the corresponding settings in fiddle~.</div><div><br></div><div>Jurgen</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:10 PM, ypatios wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
But under the hood I think it uses a better algorithm. In my experiments it<br>
reports pitch faster and more reliable and stable than fiddle~. So if you can<br>
use sigmund~ I would recommend it over fiddle~ as a replacement.<br>
</blockquote><br>
Back in the LAC 2008 in Cologne, I asked Miller that very question: what is the difference between fiddle~ and sigmund~.<br>
He said sigmund~ was the best pitch tracker he had programmed so far.<br>
So I guess fiddle is still alive just for compatibility reasons.<br>
<br>
alabala<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>ypatios<br>
_______________________________________________<br><a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>