<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div>I have similar mixer channels (mono and stereo) which I send to different busses on a global mixer. Works alright. Due to the vu taking cpu, there is a toggle box you need to click to enable the vu.</div><img id="27468bee-0e62-4786-b256-85d122b29f57" height="422" width="472" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:B3637588-6800-49E3-A4C0-369FC4096B83"><img id="c7a4015b-5f8b-4fa9-8799-843564d1eec6" height="414" width="459" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:A2F4F910-159A-4139-9843-CAB601014708"><br><div><div>On Apr 24, 2010, at 1:37 PM, servando barreiro wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="position: static; z-index: auto; "><tbody><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><br>Hi<br><br>I havenīt invented anything but I want to share this:<br><br><a href="http://servandobarreiro.es/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/mix_ser.png">http://servandobarreiro.es/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/mix_ser.png</a> (just th image)<br><br>Itīs quite simple, but I find it useful for live performing situations.. (and Iike that kind of aesthetic..) maybe somebody wants to improve it.. <br><br>I was thinking about adding a vu-meter per channel but at the moment, I manage ok with just two into the master section (still in progress..). In this case, the dac~ object itīs inside the mixer.<br><br><a href="http://minitronics.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/trondheim-minimixerpd.zip">http://minitronics.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/trondheim-minimixerpd.zip</a><br><br>enjoy..<br><br><br><br><br>hello Roman<br><br>I've tried Mx everytime I used netpd, so could tell what doesn't meet my criteria...<br><br>there are already plenty of stuff for fx, that's nice, I've even stolen some stuff
inside,<br>like the dynamic routing, some times ago.<br><br>In fact it's a pain in the **s do a good job in such a mixer because of aesthetics,<br>anecdotic criterium in this conversation.<br><br>There is no vu-meter in tracks, so we don't know where the signals come from, neither at each level it comes.<br><br>There is no peak value detection, we don't know what was the last highest peak value,<br>to find out what sound would overhelm the mixing equilibrium.<br><br>Using different colors for the different bus is a very good idea, and make gaining time <br>for finding the good slider,<br>but some colors gives Mx an ugly apparence that could be avoided with choosing<br>harmonious tones, for example a yellow handle over a white background slider, is just<br>a pain for the eyes. Also the green color is very agressive. <br><br>Mixing sounds is a kind of computation where the engineer need know accurately<br>which level he has to give to some tracks for
getting a correct average power,<br>for example if we add 3 Decibels we double power...<br>The necessary stuff is just a number box that would tell how much Db is modulated over a slider.<br><br><br>here is my favorite mixing tool:<br><br>http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan07/images/cubase5_l.jpg<br><br>_ we can choose DAC~ input and output bus<br>_ phase inversion<br>_ Gain level<br>_ Panning is over the number of output buses we choose<br>_ A 'Listen' button has been added with 'Solo', but I didn't use it yet.<br>_ we can record/play automation from the board.<br>_ we can choose if the signal that goes to the bus is pre or post fader.<br>_ same for vu-meter (all)<br>_ we can record stuff passing through the mixer, if it's audio it records audio, if it's midi it records midi<br>_ we can access directly to the instrument from the mixer track.<br>_ there is an internal EQ, very usefull and very well implemented into to mixer track.<br>_ we can group
tracks into group tracks.<br>_ we can save settings of each parts of the mixer.<br><br>there are also all the settings that has effect on all the the tracks, like hiding all different parts of the tracks<br>or setting peak detection time, copy-paste track params, an track edit window (so we can see all settings) ...<br><br><br><br>For going further in the discussion, I'd need to try Mx EQ's and dynamic processing fx.<br><br>This mixer is a cool project, and I'd love to use it in mine, but I'd need to make a stand alone patch.<br>is there such one?<br><br><br>----- Mail Original -----<br>De: "Roman Haefeli" <reduzierer@yahoo.de><br>Ā: "colet patrice" <colet.patrice@free.fr><br>Cc: "João Pais" <jmmmpais@googlemail.com>, "pd-list" <pd-list@iem.at><br>Envoyé: Jeudi 22 Avril 2010 19h27:10 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne<br>Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than
Pd?<br><br>Hi Patko<br><br>On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 18:27 +0200, colet.patrice@free.fr wrote:<br>I just wanted to check if someone has invented this wheel in pd...<br>apparently not...<br><br><marketing lingo><br><br>Have you checked mx from netpd? <br>http://www.netpd.org/Mx<br><br>I am not sure, if it meets your criteria, but some of it features are:<br><br>- slot for insert-fx per channel/master channel<br>- unlimited number of slots for aux-fx<br>- aux-fx can be chained<br>- you can write your own fx<br><br>By using some additional fx plugin suites, you can have:<br><br>- meta-fx, that pack 3 slots into one (this way you can have as many<br>inserts in a chain as you want)<br>- dynamic processing fx<br>- EQs<br>- time-based fx, such chorus, flanger, phaser<br>- some funky freaky stuff, such as spectral-delay, fft-based<br>pitchshifter and more.<br><br></marketing lingo><br><br><br><br>Roman<br><br><br></td></tr></tbody></table><br>
</blockquote></div><br><div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>--------</div><div>Dan Wilcox</div><div><a href="http://danomatika.com">danomatika.com</a></div><div><a href="http://robotcowboy.com">robotcowboy.com</a></div><div><br></div></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br></body></html>