<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><br>----- "Peter Plessas" <plessas@mur.at> a écrit :
<br><br>> Be advised that there is many ways of mapping faders to mulipliers. <br>> Depending on your practice it is common to have the 0dB (unity gain) <br>> mark somewhere 4/5 up the fader's range, which is inherited from <br>> analogue mixing desks and which I have found useful in the digital <br><br>yeah, I didn't realise that it is the design of the mixertrack screenshot<br>from a known software I've posted before.<br><br>> domain as well (despite the danger of clipping at the dac). The mapping <br>> of a fader's value to the actual multiplicative value is also a matter <br>> of feel (tactile). I don't know if there is much research about this <br><br>analog mixerboards has been developped for the best expression<br>of human feeling over an amplitude modulator, why looking elsewhere?<br><br>> topic, I personally prefer the [fadtodb] abstraction by Thomas Musil <br>> (iemabs/iemlib) which we use for our productions here at the IEM, and <br>> which to my humble opinion comes closest to the analogue desks i love.<br><br>yeah that's perfect!<br><br>curiously I get 100.111 db at 4/6 from [fadtodb]'s scale.<br><br>> <br>> chease,<br>> <br>> Peter<br>> </div></body></html>