Okay, thanks for explaining because Im fairly new to the list and to the PD community project.<br>The diff that I present in [1] is actually between my version and the svn hosted one.<br><br>I'll try to post a patch-file as you suggested. (by the way is there any documentation on how to treat/report bug/issues on the pd community? - I like to do things properly =P)<br>
<br>best regards,<br>Pedro Lopes<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at">zmoelnig@iem.at</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 2010-05-09 18:08, Pedro Lopes wrote:<br>
<br>
> [1] <a href="https://puredata.info/Members/PedroLopes/flashserverLinuxFix" target="_blank">https://puredata.info/Members/PedroLopes/flashserverLinuxFix</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div>it would be way easier to get the fixes into the sources if you could<br>
supply a patch-file (e.g. with "svn diff flashserver.c"), and post that<br>
(either to the bug-tracker at sourceforge or to this list)<br>
<br>
gfasdm<br>
<font color="#888888">IOhannes<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Pedro Lopes<br>contacto: <a href="mailto:jazz@radiozero.pt">jazz@radiozero.pt</a><br>website: <a href="http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes">http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes</a> <br>