<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1274176466.2014.28.camel@yoyo4" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Roman
P.S.: @pdmtl guys
It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic processing fx.
It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor output mixed
with the input signal (It not only doesn't make sense, it even adds
strange phasing effects, if the the dynamic processor uses a look-ahead
delay).
Can we agree on that? And if not, can we discuss this, so that we
finally can agree on that?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
yes i do agree. for me it was important to have wet/dry for all fx, but
of course it doesn't make sense for all fx.<br>
<br>
there's mtl also available:<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a href="http://puredata.info/Members/mtl/index_html">http://puredata.info/Members/mtl/index_html</a><br>
<br>
à+<br>
</body>
</html>