@ Lazzaro: yes I know, thanks for specifying, but the problem is that the duration of audio and video files I record don't match each other.<br><br>@ Cirylle: ok, now maybe I understand.<br>I'm actually already using a similar abstraction of yours to monitor fps :)<br>
My patch is completely automatic, it's a sonification/visualization of large amount of data, thus I just press a toggle to start it.<br><br>So: <br>if while recording the fps monitor shows 10fps, it means that also pix_write will record only 10 frames per second and _not_ 20 as I stated in gemwin, is that correct?<br>
<br>I was probably wrong assuming that whatever fps is stated in gemwin will be the recorded fps, even though the machine can't reproduce it in real-time.<br><br>Ok, so, if I can only record at 10 fps, what do you suggest to finally have a recorded video with a decent framerate? (apart from changing machine...)<br>
I guess I could use ffmpeg to double the framerate, but the video might be jittery...<br><br><br>M<br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/8/9 cyrille henry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ch@chnry.net">ch@chnry.net</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">here is a simple abstraction that output the real rendering frequency.<br>
it help a lot to track this kind of problem.<br>
c<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 09/08/2010 13:02, Lazzaro Nicolò Ciccolella a écrit :<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5">
Il 09/08/10 12.26, Lazzaro Nicolò Ciccolella ha scritto:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Il 09/08/10 12.17, Marco Donnarumma ha scritto:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
it's been a week now I'm struggling to record properly a GEM output,<br>
reading archives and forums.<br>
<br>
I have fairly complex audiovisual patch with multiple geos, four<br>
pix_snaps to create motion blur effect for 1280x320 res, and data<br>
exchange through local network.<br>
However I can record in a really good quality using both pix_record<br>
or pix_write.<br>
<br>
The problem is the recorded video is faster than the actual one.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
Hi, apologize me if it is a dumb answer, but if you apply very intensive<br>
motion bur and other stuf in your patch the speed of what you see in<br>
your gem box will be very slow. The sequence of images that is generated<br>
will necessarily faster than what you see when the patch is running.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></div></div><div class="im">
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</div></blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Marco Donnarumma aka TheSAD<br>Independent New Media Arts Professional, Performer, Teacher - Edinburgh, UK<br><br><br>PORTFOLIO: <a href="http://marcodonnarumma.com">http://marcodonnarumma.com</a><br>
LAB: <a href="http://www.thesaddj.com">http://www.thesaddj.com</a> | <a href="http://cntrl.sourceforge.net">http://cntrl.sourceforge.net</a> | <a href="http://www.flxer.net">http://www.flxer.net</a><br>EVENT: <a href="http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net">http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net</a><br>