<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Il 09/08/10 12.26, Lazzaro Nicolò Ciccolella ha scritto:
<blockquote cite="mid:4C5FD7CA.8020506@tiscalinet.it" type="cite"> Il
09/08/10 12.17, Marco Donnarumma ha scritto:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi all,
<br>
it's been a week now I'm struggling to record properly a GEM
output, reading archives and forums.
<br>
<br>
I have fairly complex audiovisual patch with multiple geos, four
pix_snaps to create motion blur effect for 1280x320 res, and
data exchange through local network.
<br>
However I can record in a really good quality using both
pix_record or pix_write.
<br>
<br>
The problem is the recorded video is faster than the actual one.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Hi, apologize me if it is a dumb answer, but if you apply very
intensive motion bur and other stuf in your patch
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<span id="result_box" class="medium_text"><span style="" title="">the
speed of what you see in your gem box will be very slow. </span><span
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" title="">The
sequence of images that is generated will necessarily faster
than what you see when the patch is running.</span></span>
</body>
</html>