Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country sometimes... :o)<br>I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA have these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc...<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bernardobarros2@gmail.com">bernardobarros2@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family<br>
I like it<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
2010/9/13 András Murányi <<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com">muranyia@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?<br>
><br>
> 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <<a href="mailto:bernardobarros2@gmail.com">bernardobarros2@gmail.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>> Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try.<br>
>><br>
>> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com">muranyia@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones <<a href="mailto:juanmjv@gmail.com">juanmjv@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time, I<br>
>> >> dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed the 32<br>
>> >> bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for 10.04<br>
>> >> available?<br>
>> >> And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices? And what about<br>
>> >> distros? Pure:dyne seems more lightweight with his xfce desktop,<br>
>> >> however I have a good processor (core 2 duo intel e7200) and 2gb of<br>
>> >> ram, planning an update to 6gb, so I dont know if xfce is a must for<br>
>> >> me.<br>
>> >> Im a "veteran" gnu/linux user, but the last years I was using OS X and<br>
>> >> W7 for music making. In Linux I want to use pd, Renoise (its available<br>
>> >> as 64 bits too), and wine for some vsts.<br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Hi There,<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I'm sort of a veteran too (started on IBM AIX in 1992, used Red Hat for<br>
>> > a<br>
>> > long time, then went back to Windows 98, later XP, which i gave up<br>
>> > finally a<br>
>> > few years ago).<br>
>> > I'm using vanilla Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit with Gnome (and 2GB of memory),<br>
>> > and my<br>
>> > impression is that it's not the WM that makes things slow, but in the<br>
>> > case<br>
>> > of Pd, it's Pd itself. Read the archives on GUI<->core communication and<br>
>> > Tcl/Tk weirdnesses. The 64-bit version of Pd is quite tidy now, well<br>
>> > actually there was a time when it seemed to me a bit slower than the<br>
>> > 32-bit<br>
>> > version, but AFAIK there's no reason for that any more (?)<br>
>> > With a decent CPU and that huge amount of RAM you (will) have, it really<br>
>> > cannot be a question of WM whatsoever. Of course, the system has to be<br>
>> > tuned<br>
>> > for realtime, undisturbed audio usage, which may include getting rid of<br>
>> > eye-candy functions, but i never experienced a problem with those. After<br>
>> > all, they use openGL, don't they?<br>
>> > The same stands for pure:dyne; at the core it's a linux kernel, and what<br>
>> > you<br>
>> > install on (or remove from) the top, it's up to you.<br>
>> > The only thing i'm missing here on 64-bit is the RT kernel. Once i find<br>
>> > a<br>
>> > nice quick way, i'll grab it, but i'm not really into home-brewing my<br>
>> > kernel. :)<br>
>> ><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Muranyi Andras<br>