That validates my statement to: "do not have the latest version" :) Do you win anything in using Lucid versus Karmic? Karmic has rt, it works like a charm, I can put jack with a latency of 9ms with H4 audio as USB audio card (no drivers no install) and no xruns - running nicely. If I do not use -rt kernel, xruns begin at that latency value.<div>
<br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Pedro Lopes<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/13 András Murányi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com">muranyia@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Nope. It's gone.<br><a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1388451" target="_blank">http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1388451</a><br><br>Andras<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/13 Pedro Lopes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt" target="_blank">pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt</a>></span><div>
<div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64 bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?) <div>
<br></div><div>Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with rt [1]</div>
<div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div>
2010/9/13 András Murányi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com" target="_blank">muranyia@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div></div><div>Ahh, livna....<br>You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to Ubuntu, what do I tall them when i go back? :o)<br>
I'll take a look at it, and also at home-brewing a kernel. Maybe that's the way forward.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Andras<div><div></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bernardobarros2@gmail.com" target="_blank">bernardobarros2@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
Then you have to add Fusion free+non-free (maybe livna?) to your repos.<br>
<div><div></div><div><br>
<br>
2010/9/13 András Murányi <<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com" target="_blank">muranyia@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country<br>
> sometimes... :o)<br>
> I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA have<br>
> these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc...<br>
><br>
> 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <<a href="mailto:bernardobarros2@gmail.com" target="_blank">bernardobarros2@gmail.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>> yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family<br>
>> I like it<br>
>><br>
>> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com" target="_blank">muranyia@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> > Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?<br>
>> ><br>
>> > 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <<a href="mailto:bernardobarros2@gmail.com" target="_blank">bernardobarros2@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com" target="_blank">muranyia@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> >> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones <<a href="mailto:juanmjv@gmail.com" target="_blank">juanmjv@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time, I<br>
>> >> >> dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed the<br>
>> >> >> 32<br>
>> >> >> bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for 10.04<br>
>> >> >> available?<br>
>> >> >> And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices? And what about<br>
>> >> >> distros? Pure:dyne seems more lightweight with his xfce desktop,<br>
>> >> >> however I have a good processor (core 2 duo intel e7200) and 2gb of<br>
>> >> >> ram, planning an update to 6gb, so I dont know if xfce is a must for<br>
>> >> >> me.<br>
>> >> >> Im a "veteran" gnu/linux user, but the last years I was using OS X<br>
>> >> >> and<br>
>> >> >> W7 for music making. In Linux I want to use pd, Renoise (its<br>
>> >> >> available<br>
>> >> >> as 64 bits too), and wine for some vsts.<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Hi There,<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > I'm sort of a veteran too (started on IBM AIX in 1992, used Red Hat<br>
>> >> > for<br>
>> >> > a<br>
>> >> > long time, then went back to Windows 98, later XP, which i gave up<br>
>> >> > finally a<br>
>> >> > few years ago).<br>
>> >> > I'm using vanilla Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit with Gnome (and 2GB of memory),<br>
>> >> > and my<br>
>> >> > impression is that it's not the WM that makes things slow, but in the<br>
>> >> > case<br>
>> >> > of Pd, it's Pd itself. Read the archives on GUI<->core communication<br>
>> >> > and<br>
>> >> > Tcl/Tk weirdnesses. The 64-bit version of Pd is quite tidy now, well<br>
>> >> > actually there was a time when it seemed to me a bit slower than the<br>
>> >> > 32-bit<br>
>> >> > version, but AFAIK there's no reason for that any more (?)<br>
>> >> > With a decent CPU and that huge amount of RAM you (will) have, it<br>
>> >> > really<br>
>> >> > cannot be a question of WM whatsoever. Of course, the system has to<br>
>> >> > be<br>
>> >> > tuned<br>
>> >> > for realtime, undisturbed audio usage, which may include getting rid<br>
>> >> > of<br>
>> >> > eye-candy functions, but i never experienced a problem with those.<br>
>> >> > After<br>
>> >> > all, they use openGL, don't they?<br>
>> >> > The same stands for pure:dyne; at the core it's a linux kernel, and<br>
>> >> > what<br>
>> >> > you<br>
>> >> > install on (or remove from) the top, it's up to you.<br>
>> >> > The only thing i'm missing here on 64-bit is the RT kernel. Once i<br>
>> >> > find<br>
>> >> > a<br>
>> >> > nice quick way, i'll grab it, but i'm not really into home-brewing my<br>
>> >> > kernel. :)<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Muranyi Andras<br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div></div><font color="#888888">-- <br>Muranyi Andras<br>
</font><br></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div>Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc)<br>contact: <a href="mailto:pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt" target="_blank">pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt</a><br>website: <a href="http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes" target="_blank">http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes</a> <br>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Muranyi Andras<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc)<br>contact: <a href="mailto:pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt" target="_blank">pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt</a><br>website: <a href="http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes" target="_blank">http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes</a> <br>
</div>