<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Just one thought about the "in between samples" thing.<div><br></div><div>In recent times there has been some discussions about inter-sample peaks. For more discussion there is an article about it with a free software download on the SSL site:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.solid-state-logic.com/music/x-ism/">http://www.solid-state-logic.com/music/x-ism/</a></div><div><br></div><div>But I don't know if the author of the original post was talking about that.</div><div><br></div><div>Best</div><div>Jurgen</div><div><br></div><div><div>On Dec 22, 2010, at 10:01 PM, brandon zeeb wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">If Pd's default block size is 64 samples, and "events" are only processed at the beginning of a block cycle.<br><br>Therefore, if you're running at 48,000hz sample rate, then your "Event Rate" is 750hz.<br>
Likewise a 96,000hz sample rate will give you a 1500hz "Event Rate".<br><br>As Mathieu mentioned, if you need anything higher than this, your only options are:<br><ol><li>Decrease your block size</li><li>Calculate at audio-rate using ~ objects</li>
</ol>As for "between samples", are you referring to some kind of upsampling? In that case, either increase the sample rate of a sub-patch using [block~] relative to the current sample rate, or use either a [delread~]/[delwrite~] pair or [fexpr~] to hold the last sample value from a given stream for calculation.<br>
<br>~Brandon<br>
_______________________________________________<br><a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br></blockquote></div><br></body></html>