ahh yes that definition of RJDJ is clear now...<div><br></div><div>It's nice have Pd ported to here and there but perhaps time need to sort of licence matters would not make it worth it.</div><div><br></div><div>I remember using Pd for the old ipods via ipod linux- that was a really good project,<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Andy Farnell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk">padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 10:53:37 +0000<br>
ALAN BROOKER <<a href="mailto:alan.brooker2010@gmail.com">alan.brooker2010@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Regarding ugly plan: Is app store 'lock-in' any different from apple's usual<br>
> hardware' lock in' for laptops/desktops? Pd still runs on those platforms so<br>
> why not port ipad, ipod, iphone upud, ipid etc?<br>
><br>
> In any case isnt RJDJ the port for Pd to this platform anyway ? I could be<br>
> wrong- not 100%<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>I wouldn't say it's a port of of Pd, not as an application.<br>
It's a port of Pd to support a specific application class<br>
with its own interfaces.<br>
<br>
The GUI for Pd on a tablet would be quite different anyway,<br>
to take advantage of that device's touch gestures, a direct<br>
port of the keyboard oriented interface would miss an opportunity.<br>
<br>
Regarding Apple, who are only one manufacturer of mobile<br>
and tablet devices; I think this is a moral issue that can<br>
be easily settled by watching this famous advertisement,<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8</a><br>
<br>
and comparing the stance implied there with their position<br>
25 years later.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Derek Holzer <<a href="mailto:derek@umatic.nl">derek@umatic.nl</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > But kids have such a shorter attention span these days....<br>
> ><br>
> > D.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 1/8/11 4:29 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > BTW, the nineties had another site for that, which had a lot more text,<br>
> >> from which you could actually learn, instead of OMG FAIL.<br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > ::: derek holzer ::: <a href="http://macumbista.net" target="_blank">http://macumbista.net</a> :::<br>
> > ---Oblique Strategy # 46:<br>
> > "Disconnect from desire"<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -><br>
> > <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
> ><br>
<br>
<br>
</div><font color="#888888">--<br>
Andy Farnell <<a href="mailto:padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk">padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk</a>><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>