Seems to me like nothing is ever "realtime" in DSP anyway...<br><br>Pierre<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/1/17 Roman Haefeli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:reduzent@gmail.com">reduzent@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 02:01 +0100, Dietrich Pank wrote:<br>
> Thank you Roman,<br>
><br>
> I do think it is possible to get sample correct bangs from<br>
> analyzed<br>
> audio:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2010-12/085681.html" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2010-12/085681.html</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Ok! After reading this tip again I understood it something better.<br>
> But..well, one block later may be accourate theoretically but not<br>
> real(time).<br>
<br>
</div>True. But this is a logical problem that also an external wouldn't be<br>
able to solve. The results of some analysis of data cannot be delivered<br>
before the data was delivered.<br>
<br>
With a block size of 1 this latency could be improved, but it would be<br>
still one sample late, so still not real-time in that sense.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Roman<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>