Greetings,<br> Thank you for your responses. I tried your suggestion, hardoff, and the result is the attached [ead-reverse~]. Unfortunately, the expression behaves differently with this [vline~]-construction as with the [phasor~]. Here, if 1 is entered into the right input of [expr~], the result is an envelope whose steepness becomes exponentially smaller while ascending and exponentially greater while descending (if near 0, the opposite form is produced and values between 1 and 0 produce a divided, confused form). I however wish to produce an envelope that becomes exponentially steeper both ascending and descending. <br>
My problem with this [expr~] as well as with Mr. Farnell's patches is that I do not quite understand the math behind them. Any ideas?<br><br>Best regards,<br>Stephan Elliot Perez<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:54 PM, hard off <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hard.off@gmail.com">hard.off@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
instead of the [phaser~], send a [line~] (or [vline~]) signal.<br><br>for example:<br><br>[1, 0.5 500, 0 1000 500(<br>|<br>[vline~]<br><br><br>like most of my patches, i don't think i originally made that one, someone else posted it, and i just copied. ;)<br>
must have been a long time ago though, cos i barely remember it.<br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Stephan Elliot Perez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dreamoftheshoreofanotherworld@gmail.com" target="_blank">dreamoftheshoreofanotherworld@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><div></div><div><div class="gmail_quote">Greetings,<br>
I wish to produce a wave form with the opposite form of the normal ead~ wave (the curves become exponentially steeper instead of flatter), which I can achieve by entering a negative number into the phasor in hard off's exact-ead~ patch, which I downloaded from the archive. However, I still want to be able to independently change the length of the ascent, decline, and distance between waves as is possible with ead~. Does anyone know how I could do this, or possibly have access to an abstraction-version of ead~?<br>
<br>Best regards,<br>Stephan<br>
<br></div><br>
</div></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>