Dear List,<br><br>I think this "technological parody" discussion is very funny. <br><br>As some of you may know, most (if not all) of the north indian classical instruments were designed to sound like the human voice. <br>
I'm very naive, so i 'm wondering : is a sitar a technological parody? Stupid Indians, they get blood-filled blisters on their fingers to learn how to play a technological parody!<br><br>Just kidding (though it's true about the desing of indian instruments).<br>
<br>I do believe that the output is the only important thing to consider. The fact that Aphex Twin used a sampler (or whatever, i don't know) to record the drum track to Flim doesn't matter at all to me. This is an amazing piece, that very few musicians (if any) on earth could have created. The fact that he created it on a sequencer in 97 and not on a drumkit in 1963 doesn't make any difference to me. <br>
<br>Pierre<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/23 Jonathan Wilkes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">Certainly could be. :)<br><br>Or on the other hand:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cuuRG6-IT8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cuuRG6-IT8</a><br>
<br>-Jonathan<br><br>--- On <b>Thu, 6/23/11, Tyler Leavitt <i><<a href="mailto:thecryoflove@gmail.com" target="_blank">thecryoflove@gmail.com</a>></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">
<br>From: Tyler Leavitt <<a href="mailto:thecryoflove@gmail.com" target="_blank">thecryoflove@gmail.com</a>><div class="im"><br>Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED<br>To: "Jonathan Wilkes" <<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>><br>
</div>Cc: "ALAN BROOKER" <<a href="mailto:alan.brooker2010@gmail.com" target="_blank">alan.brooker2010@gmail.com</a>>, <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">pd-list@iem.at</a><br>Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 5:25 AM<div>
<div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP_w_Mvh9tU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP_w_Mvh9tU</a><div><br></div><div>Is this a technological parody?<br>
<br><div>On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jonathan
Wilkes <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=jancsika@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">Yes, it's exactly like that. But that's the way the term was defined, which-- as you <br>
point out-- covers wide array of synthesis techniques and uses of digital computers.<br><br>I would just conclude that it doesn't seem a particularly enlightening term, except for <br>a specific subset of parodies that have to do with technology. As a term of derision <br>
I think it's confusing/confused.<br><br>-Jonathan<br><br>--- On <b>Wed, 6/22/11, ALAN BROOKER <i><<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=alan.brooker2010@gmail.com" target="_blank">alan.brooker2010@gmail.com</a>></i></b> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">
<br>From: ALAN BROOKER <<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=alan.brooker2010@gmail.com" target="_blank">alan.brooker2010@gmail.com</a>><div><br>Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED<br></div>To: "Jonathan Wilkes" <<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=jancsika@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">pd-list@iem.at</a>, "Cody Loyd" <<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=codyloyd@gmail.com" target="_blank">codyloyd@gmail.com</a>><br>
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011,
10:44 PM<div><div></div><div><br><br><div><br><br><div>On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=jancsika@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">You're right, no one ever said that. Even me.<br><br>Did you actually look at the patch? It is a technological parody of record scratching. <br>
It perfectly fits the definition given on this list. If you don't think so, then<br>please tell me what you can do with that patch that's so musically interesting that it <br>would warrant buying a modern digital computer instead of a turntable.<br>
<br></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: medium;">Well, one might want to connect the sampler patch to another patch that produces a contrasting sound, they both would share the same values sent to the atom to change pitches ect.</span></div>
<div><font size="3"><br></font></div><div>Don't you think to say a patch that emulates scratching sounds from audio samples is a technological parody of a scratching record player, is a bit like saying a patch that emulates the sound of the piano is a technological parody of a piano (they are both instruments)?. I think one purpose of audio software to emulate instruments ? Regarding if it is musically interesting, I'm v. sure you know record scratching is(was?) used as an instrument in hip hop and such.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If a purpose of audio software is emulation of physical instruments then I don't think it should be labeled as a technological parody. Otherwise you could use the argument 'why have a computer when I can buy a physical instrument' every time? </div>
<div><br></div><div> Just sharing thoughts really, interesting topic.</div><div><br></div>
<div><br></div></div>
</div></div></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://mc/compose?to=Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>