<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
As I say, I could neaten this in a number of ways, I was considering some form of [loadbang] triggered script to delete the objects on creation, then use a delay to initialize the generative patch. Which would also solve the problem.<br><br><div>> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:00:40 +0200<br>> From: fbar@footils.org<br>> To: pd-list@iem.at<br>> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd "monosymphonia"<br>> <br>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:32:27AM +0100, Andrew Faraday wrote:<br>> > P.S. I do realize that I could clean this up a great deal. The addition of<br>> > [table] objects could just as easily be a single expanding array, I could<br>> > hide modules away in sub patches and the sliders used for visualization could<br>> > be more efficiently done with gem. <br>> <br>> Regarding subpatches: I would do this kind of dynamic object generation in a<br>> subpatch anyway instead of putting the new objects into the main patch. That<br>> way, you can easily start with a fresh subpatch by sending "clean" to [s<br>> pd-subpatchname] instead of having to manually delete the created<br>> tables/objects.<br>> <br>> Ciao<br>> -- <br>> Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list<br>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list<br></div> </div></body>
</html>