Yeah, thought as much. Just a bit annoying. <div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Joe<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 July 2011 17:57, Jack <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jack@rybn.org">jack@rybn.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Yep, there is a bug. For a workaround, you can add a [bang( message<br>
between [route] and [pack].<br>
++<br>
<br>
Jack<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2011 à 17:44 +0100, Joe White a écrit :<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> Hi list,<br>
><br>
><br>
> I've been doing some patching with [route] and came across a problem -<br>
> I'd love it if someone could explain why this happens otherwise I<br>
> think it's a bug.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Basically I'm sending a message with one item to a route object with<br>
> an argument of the same name. For example:<br>
><br>
><br>
> [start (<br>
> |<br>
> [route start]<br>
><br>
><br>
> This is connected to a [pack f]. When I bang the start message the<br>
> route object outputs a bang, which in turn should output the stored<br>
> number in the pack object. However, this does not happen (which is the<br>
> problem).<br>
><br>
><br>
> If I connect a [t b] after the [route] and before the [pack f] it<br>
> works. It also works with [f ] instead of [pack f] and a [select]<br>
> object will correctly bang the pack. I've attached a patch to show<br>
> this.<br>
><br>
><br>
> What seems weird is that it is not a problem with either [route] or<br>
> [pack f] on their own, but rather only when they are connected.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Joe<br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>