<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span><br></span></div><div><br><div>----- Original Message -----<br>> From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca><br>> To: Andy Farnell <padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk><br>> Cc: pd-list@iem.at<br>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 1:04 PM<br>> Subject: Re: [PD] [PD-dev] tkwidgets<br>> <br>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Andy Farnell wrote:<br>> <br>>> If the developer exhibits a capacity for purposefulness, couldn't that <br>> same a sense of purpose be used to undo a mistake?<br>> <br>> Well, the developer would have to think of those things as mistakes first, and <br>> also, to think of vanilla's ways as being the solutions. When the idea of <br>> «cleaner design than vanilla's» is to use a big if else if else if else if <br>> else if else if instead of the constructor table
and instead of every method <br>> table, does it make it look like you or I has any business trying to change the <br>> mind of the author, and does that look easier than (!!!) submitting patches to <br>> Miller ?<br><br>_Submitting_ patches to Miller is easy.<br><br>-Jonathan<br><br>> <br>> _______________________________________________________________________<br>> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list<br>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <br>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list<br>></div></div></div></body></html>