<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/9/19 Jonathan Wilkes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
>________________________________<br>
>From: tim vets <<a href="mailto:timvets@gmail.com">timvets@gmail.com</a>><br>
>To: Pierre Massat <<a href="mailto:pimassat@gmail.com">pimassat@gmail.com</a>>; James Dunn <<a href="mailto:james@4thharmonic.com">james@4thharmonic.com</a>>; pd-list <<a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a>><br>
>Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 4:08 PM<br>
>Subject: Re: [PD] stop sample playback when phasor~ reset?<br>
<div class="im">><br>
><br>
>When you use phasor~, you normally already know how long it will take for the sound to be finished playing (because you set its frequency to play it back at the proper speed)<br>
>Store the information about the sound loaded (or recorded) and use that to stop the playback after one play duration.<br>
><br>
><br>
>[del <time>]<br>
>|<br>
>[t b b]<br>
>| |<br>
>[0( [0(<br>
>[ |<br>
>[phasor]<br>
<br>
</div>What's the benefit of this over a line~ based approach?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It depends what you want to do, i guess, for doing granular synthesis and the like, I'd use phasor~ rather than line~. The benefit being that fast repetition is easier ( try [metro 0.5] ...).</div>
<div>Tim</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888">
-Jonathan<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
>You get <time> ms is from [soundfiler]--[/ 44.1], or the length of your table times 44.1. (assuming your sound runs at 44.1 kHz)<br>
>Probably best to put a [hip~ 5] after that, in case the first sample of your table is not 0.<br>
><br>
>Tim<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>2011/9/19 Pierre Massat <<a href="mailto:pimassat@gmail.com">pimassat@gmail.com</a>><br>
><br>
>I generally use threshold~, though it's quite tricky too...<br>
>><br>
>>Pierre<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>2011/9/19 James Dunn <<a href="mailto:james@4thharmonic.com">james@4thharmonic.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>>Hi list,<br>
>>><br>
>>>I'm controlling tabread4~ with a phasor~ but don't want my samples to loop (most of the time). What's the best way to detect a phasor~'s reset? ( in both directions - I'm playing the samples forwards and backwards). I've looked at edge~ and samphold~ triggered by a bang~ but it seems quite tricky.<br>
>>><br>
>>>thanks<br>
>>><br>
>>>James<br>
>>><br>
>>>_______________________________________________<br>
>>><a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
>>>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>>_______________________________________________<br>
>><a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
>>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
><a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>