Oops, failed to hit 'replay to all' again. :)<div><br></div><div>Also, I'll attach a sample of the process from Activity Monitor.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Rich E</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:reakinator@gmail.com">reakinator@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:43 AM<br>Subject: Re: [PD] C++ for reusable dsp lib - or better use C?<br>To: Mathieu Bouchard <<a href="mailto:matju@artengine.ca">matju@artengine.ca</a>><br><br><br>Any idea why Pd-Extended is using 3x cpu than vanilla in OS X? When I leave it idle with dsp off, my fans hum..<div>
<br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>Rich<div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Rich E <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:reakinator@gmail.com" target="_blank">reakinator@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>(To throw in a different take). I definitely like C++ more for ease of interface. Templated math functions and overloaded operators are just too nice, the code looks so much better (at a user level).</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>There are also plenty of audio languages written in C++ - SuperCollider, ZenGarden (which is coincidentally a rewrite of pd-core in C++), and Faust are the first three that come to mind. For graphics, there is both openFrameworks and Cinder, which each use very different features of the language.</div>
<div><br></div><div>In the end, I think you should use the language with the features you wish to use. While you could build an OO language on top of C, it is essentially a procedural language, so why bother when that is what C++ is for?</div>
<span><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">- rich</div>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</div><br></div>