<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/7/19 Hans Roels <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hans.roels@base.be" target="_blank">hans.roels@base.be</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I need pictures of > 300 dpi </blockquote><div><br>how does one expect what "300 dots per inch" is supposed to mean, <br>without specifying many _inches_ it has to be?<br>it's like describing the distance between two places in 'km/h'...<br>
it's a myth <a href="http://www.rideau-info.com/photos/mythdpi.html">http://www.rideau-info.com/photos/mythdpi.html</a> :)<br>
<br>Tim<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">of a Pd patch to publish them in an article. I generated postscript files with 'print' in the menu but the copy editor wants a better quality. I also enlarged the fonts of the patch and then generated a postscript file but it still isn't good enough. I used screen capture software on windows and linux but with the same -not good enough- result.<br>
Has anyone any tips to solve this issue? Maybe someone that has experience with printing Pd patches in books or articles... (for example I notice that in Miller his book the diagonal lines connecting the objects are really diagonal, not in steps...).<br>
<br>
I need a quick answer and solution for the editor before tomorrow/friday evening! Thanks for any advice...<br>
<br>
best,<br>
Hans r<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/<u></u>listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>