<div>
Hi John
</div><div><br></div><div>I've been getting pretty reliable 128-sample buffers using JACK with my mid-2010 15". I don't usually use 64 but when I've tried it's been no problem. Can't remember what it translates to in ms, but 128 seems like "instant" to me, somewhere between 5-10 I think. Others may be able to offer more detail/correct me.</div><div><br></div><div>cheers</div><div>dafydd</div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Dafydd Hughes<br></div><div>dafydd61@gmail.com</div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Thursday, 26 July, 2012 at 2:53 PM, JF wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div>I'm on the market for a second hand 13" Macbook Pro circa late 2009 - early/mid 2010. I was wondering if anybody here has had experience of using the stock internal soundcard for low latency for pd?</div><div><br></div><div>What kind of millisecond ballpark would I be looking at?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance,</div><div>John.<br></div></div></div><div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div><a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list</div><div>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a></div></div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>