simultaneously would be better. but maybe not the 50 at the same time , maybe simultaneously up to 8?<br><br> Is it too much difference? simultaneously vs no simultaneously?<br><br>cheers<br><br><br><br><br>U.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2012/9/2 Andy Farnell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk" target="_blank">padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
In that case Umberto, one more specific question;<br>
<br>
Do you need these speakers to play simultaneously, or<br>
for just one to make a sound at any time?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Andy<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 09:18:55PM +0200, umberto torrez wrote:<br>
> Hi, Andy and how does your system work? Do you have a link?<br>
> How many speakers are you using?<br>
><br>
><br>
> I dont need high degree of phase stability , i need to control 50 very<br>
> cheap speakers. I dont really mind if they dont produce all the frequency<br>
> range.<br>
> If each speaker generate only one frequency , its ok.<br>
><br>
> I only need to be able to control them (the 50) from the computer, i was<br>
> thinking, maybe not using sound?<br>
><br>
><br>
> cheers<br>
><br>
> U.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2012/9/2 Andy Farnell <<a href="mailto:padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk">padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk</a>><br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > A question to consider; Do the channels need a high degree<br>
> > of phase stability?<br>
> ><br>
> > Fernando is designing for a WFS system here. You may have more<br>
> > relaxed requirements for a theatre or installation multichannel<br>
> > system not needing such a degree of correlation.<br>
> > Using a very simliar approach with jack-udp, but with<br>
> > asynchronous receivers, chained ethernet, using gumstick<br>
> > or Raspberry Pi boards with cheap audio USB dongles.<br>
> ><br>
> > Andy<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:<br>
> > > Best solution I've seen so far is by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano -- there's a<br>
> > > paper in the Linux Audio Conference 2012:<br>
> > > <a href="http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/papers/29.pdf" target="_blank">http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/papers/29.pdf</a><br>
> > ><br>
> > > cheers<br>
> > > miller<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:50PM +0200, umberto torrez wrote:<br>
> > > > Hi list, i was wondering which is the best approach for controlling a<br>
> > lots<br>
> > > > of speakers with pd? 50 ?<br>
> > > > Is there any hardware or technique that allows to do this and that is<br>
> > not<br>
> > > > so expensive?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > any idea?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Umberto.<br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
<br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>