<p>Documentation is certainly just as important, if not more so. What I am suggesting is to build a framework that will be to some extent immediately useful, but also whose full potential well be realized only after all the documentation is properly updated.</p>
<p>I'm also thinking about simply getting rid of any externals in pd-l2ork that don't have proper or at least half-decent documentation.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 8, 2012 1:19 AM, "Jonathan Wilkes" <<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic <<a href="mailto:ico@vt.edu">ico@vt.edu</a>><br>
> To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' <<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>><br>
> Cc: <a href="mailto:pd-list@iem.at">pd-list@iem.at</a>; 'Raphael Raccuia' <<a href="mailto:rafael.raccuia@blindekinder.com">rafael.raccuia@blindekinder.com</a>><br>
> Sent: Friday, September 7, 2012 8:25 PM<br>
> Subject: RE: [PD] finding objects ?<br>
><br>
>> I can update vcf~ in the PDDP docs at some point, but aside from that what<br>
>> do you have in mind?<br>
><br>
> Multi-dimensional indexing whose data can be easily referenced by multiple<br>
> features (object search, auto-completion, maybe other)<br>
><br>
<br>
How will multiple dimensions help users find something that isn't there?<br>
<br>
-Jonathan<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>