<p dir="ltr">Forgot to copy the list....</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: "Ivica Bukvic" <<a href="mailto:ico@vt.edu">ico@vt.edu</a>><br>Date: Feb 6, 2013 3:13 PM<br>Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?<br>
To: "Charles Goyard" <<a href="mailto:cg@fsck.fr">cg@fsck.fr</a>><br>Cc: <br><br type="attribution"><p dir="ltr"><br>
On Feb 6, 2013 3:07 PM, "Charles Goyard" <<a href="mailto:cg@fsck.fr" target="_blank">cg@fsck.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:<br>
> > On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote:<br>
> > > I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork,<br>
> > > but I just wanted to point that out.<br>
> > Gem's "install script" (aka Makefile) installs everything, including<br>
> > all compiled backends.<br>
> > what makes you say that there is a bug here?<br>
><br>
> You're right. I tried from crash with Gem alone and everything is ok:<br>
> make clean<br>
> git pull<br>
> aclocal<br>
> ./autogen.sh<br>
> # ^-- btw this two commands are missing from the readme.txt<br>
> ./configure --with-pd=/opt/pd-vanilla-0.43/ --prefix=/opt/gem</p>
<p dir="ltr">2 questions:</p>
<p dir="ltr">1. Why are you compiling gem separately when pd-l2ork compiles it for you and includes it with its binary package?</p>
<p dir="ltr">2. Why are you trying to use pd-vanilla includes with pd-l2ork (unless you are using pd instead of pd-l2ork)? The two are not compatible and as I indicated on the site with a huge warning box mixing the two will cause crashes and unexpected behavior.</p>
<p dir="ltr">> make<br>
> sudo make install<br>
><br>
> When all goes smooth on first time, everything is ok.<br>
> However, it seems that if something fails during compilation and you<br>
> rerun make, then the .so files are not copied if they were produced by<br>
> the former run of make. It already occured to me when building<br>
> pd-extended a few months back. It can be a dependency problem in the<br>
> various targets, a bug in make, something wrong with my system, a<br>
> personal problem with my cat... Whatever the cause, I get a source<br>
> directory with everything: sources, gem.pd_linux and *.so, and an install<br>
> directory with everything but the *.so files (yes, the gem.pd_linux gets<br>
> copied).<br>
><br>
> I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, so apologizes for using the<br>
> wrong word. Maybe it's worth writing in the README.txt what a make clean<br>
> can be necessary on some cases.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Ivica Bukvic wrote:<br>
> > How did you install pd-l2ork?<br>
><br>
> From source with archlinux's PKGBUILD, with cwiid missing. So I first<br>
> ran a build, which failed, and then fixed the problem, rerun the build<br>
> and got into the problems described above.<br>
><br>
><br>
> > Again, I need as much information as possible about how you installed the<br>
> > software.<br>
><br>
> Well, I'll say the problem comes from make/fix/make. Obviously it's not<br>
> that important at all. There is/was the same kind of problem in<br>
> pd-extended with ln -s other existing symlimks that forces you to clean<br>
> and rebuild everything (I reported that on sf) after hours of<br>
> compilation just because a symlink exists. Annoying ain't it ?<br>
><br>
> Thank you all for your being patient :), and of course for your great<br>
> software !<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Charles<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</p>
</div>